RNC Chairman: Roles and Responsibilities

The Republican National Committee is the primary driving force behind our nation’s conservative political party. It is vital to the election pursuits of Republican politicians on the national and state levels.

The first rule in the organizational guidelines of the Republican National Committee clearly signifies the critical role the RNC plays in the general management of the party. There are two key positions in the RNC that are elected. Both the chair and co-chair of the RNC are full-time paid positions.

Republican National Committee Overview

The first Republican National Committee was formed in 1856. Originally, the RNC was composed of a single member from each U.S. state and territory. The RNC equally represents each state regardless of population.

In 1952, various guidelines were included to expand committee membership to reflect Republican sentiment in individual states. Since 2011, there are 168 members on the RNC. One chairman of the RNC went on to become President of the United States, George H.W. Bush.

Numerous Republican state governors have served as RNC chair. Across the last decade, the demographic of the Republican Party has been changing. This has been a central focus of the RNC, especially the chairperson.

The RNC’s key role is to provide direction and leadership to the Republican Party. It is the most powerful single body behind conservative politics in the United States. Let’s look at the roles and responsibilities for the person elected to chair this vital part of the Republican Party.

The Role and Responsibilities of the RNC Chair

The duties and responsibilities of the individual who has been designated as the RNC chair span an array of areas. Many have assumed the chair role on a national level after serving as the chairperson for an individual state.

Current RNC chairperson, Ronna McDaniel first served as chair to the Michigan Republican Party before assuming her current role as RNC chair. Let’s explore the role the RNC chairperson plays, including some important responsibilities.

The Face of the RNC

While the more prominent elected members of the Republican Party are more visibly recognizable as the face of the party, the RNC chairperson generates a massive amount of media exposure. They must have a strong public presence. As such they don’t get too deep into more fringe political issues that could lead to backlash, such as restrictions on residential water usage or the regulation of emerging pet products.

During various election cycles, the RNC chairperson will make numerous public appearances across multiple media outlets. The chair will do interviews addressing the election strategy and policy focus of the Republican Party. One key role of the chairperson is as the face of the RNC.

Election Strategy

The RNC chairperson must be a skilled communicator. This person will speak publicly concerning the vision of the Republican Party. There will be calls to debate contentious policy differences with the individual elected to chair the Democrat National Committee.

The ability of the RNC chairperson to articulate election strategy across the entire Republican Party is critical. This individual chairs vital meetings of all RNC members. Election strategies are made by group decision, but it is the RNC chair’s duty to formulate a plan for explaining this strategy to the voting public.

Fundraising and Recruitment

The RNC Chairperson works closely with the RNC board to coordinate fundraising and recruitment. They help establish the goals and develop a strategy for meeting these goals. Together with board members, the chairperson helps to design the RNC’s message.

The RNC chairperson helps organize the public efforts to build campaign donations and recruit new voters to the Republican Party. These are two of the most important responsibilities of the RNC chair.

It is the responsibility of the RNC chairperson to nominate the RNC, a chairman for the Republican Finance Committee. Blended with strong public communication skills, the RNC chairperson is a vital part of fundraising and recruitment.

Appointment of Counsel

Another important responsibility of the RNC chairperson is to appoint a general counsel to the Republican National Committee. This individual, including a staff, serves as counsel to various RNC committees and sub-committees. The council is approved by RNC vote but serves at the will of the RNC chairperson.

Member of the Executive Committee of the Republican National Committee

The RNC chairperson is also the lead member of the important RNC Executive Committee. This committee has the power to utilize all executive and administrative functions of the RNC. The Executive Committee coordinates the election of officers to the RNC.

Executive Committee members, including the RNC chairperson, orchestrate the time, date, and location for the Republican National Convention. This committee is also entrusted with filing the nomination for the President and Vice-President for the Republican Party.

The Republican National Committee is a vital force within the Republican Party. It is the national organization that formulates the conservative party’s strategy. The RNC is the voice of conservative politics, and the RNC chairperson is the face of that voice. While not as visible as the actual candidates themselves, the RNC chairperson is a vital cog in the Republican Party.

Scott Walker & Ted Cruz: Where They Align and Where They Don’t

Scott Walker and Ted Cruz are two high-profile Republican lawmakers. Both are prominent conservative politicians. Texas state senator Cruz is more recognizable on a national level. But Walker, as governor of Wisconsin, is very well-known, especially across the Midwest.

Walker is three years older than Ted Cruz, and each man is a strong advocate for conservative political ideas. However, while they align in many areas, there are points that they respectfully disagree with. Let’s look at where Scott Walker and Ted Cruz align politically, and where they don’t agree.

Where They Align

Both Scott Walker and Ted Cruz are members of the Republican Party. Therefore, they align with most of the general conservative ideology. Each is strongly pro-life, ardently opposed to abortion. Walker and Cruz have vocalized their distaste for the Affordable Care Act.

Each man strongly supports a secure southern border as a national priority. They each advocate for smaller government and fiscally responsible legislation. Neither Cruz nor Walker supports same-sex marriage or civil unions. Let’s look at some additional policy concepts where they align.

Climate Change

Senator Ted Cruz has voiced his rejection of much of the scientific consensus on climate change. Cruz insists that far too many people fall into the category of global warming alarmists. His biggest stance against climate change was the letter he signed along with 22 other U.S. Senators encouraging the Trump administration to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement.

Scott Walker’s views on climate change have aligned with those of the Texas Senator. Walker signed a pledge to never support any laws designed to raise taxes to battle climate change. He has also been a keynote speaker, denying or rationalizing global warming denials. Walker also believes many environmental powers should be given back to the states, not the federal EPA.

Gun Control

Cruz and Walker differ somewhat on criminal justice, but they align closely with gun control. In fact, both are adamantly opposed to any form of legislative gun control. Cruz believes that gun violence is the result of a misplaced liberal focus on guns not restructuring crime legislation to punish violent crime more so than non-violent infractions.

Both Cruz and Walker oppose gun control legislation, but Walker has been visibly more committed to his beliefs. During his time as governor, Walker signed legislation making Wisconsin the 49th concealed carry state. He also helped remove his state’s 48-hour waiting period to purchase a firearm, plus allowed off-duty law enforcement to carry in a school zone.

Where They Don’t

Since both Ted Cruz and Scott Walker both align heavily conservative, the number of areas that they agree on politically is considerable. However, there are a few instances where they don’t necessarily agree, or at least they disagree on how to reach a conservative consensus on policy. Let’s look at a couple of these areas of political alignment where they don’t agree.

Criminal Justice

One difference between Walker and Cruz would involve their differences in opinion on criminal justice. Walker has long voiced an adamant position that was tough-on-crime. During his tenure in the Wisconsin state legislature, Walker frequently sought to impose tougher sentencing guidelines and a reduction in the pathway to parole for certain crimes.

On the contrary, Senator Cruz has supported a more lax approach. He has openly voiced a disagreement with overly harsh minimum sentencing guidelines for non-violent infractions. Cruz is an advocate for the death penalty. In addition, he does not agree that marijuana should be legalized, but he also feels federal laws criminalizing the drug should be removed given to the states.

Budget Policy

One of the few areas where Cruz and Walker do not align is on specific views about economics and budget. Ted Cruz is more of a free-trade advocate as opposed to Walker’s more nationalistic approach to economics.

Walker’s economic policies came to the forefront during his last tenure as governor. He encouraged Wisconsin dairy farmers to ramp up production. His state-focused policy caused a huge surplus in the milk market, a decision that actually reduced profits for his local dairy farmers.

Cruz, on the other hand, has proposed a total end to the IRS, plus supports a federal flat tax. The Texas Senator is strongly opposed to a federal minimum wage, while Walker has never spoken out against a national wage policy.

While Scott Walker and Ted Cruz are two visible leaders within the Republican Party, they don’t always agree on every policy. Most of their core political beliefs align very well. However, there are a couple of points where these two men don’t align. Nevertheless, they are both ardent conservatives who are dedicated to the Republican ideas.