Weekly Musing 5-19-13

Weekly Musing 5-19-13

Saul Anuzis

 

‘Is this still America?’

Texas Republican Congressman Kevin Brady asks IRS’s Miller.

This Is No Ordinary Scandal Political abuse of the IRS threatens the basic integrity of our government.

We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate. The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous. No one likes what they’re seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue Service have left the administration’s credibility deeply, probably irretrievably damaged. They don’t look jerky now, they look dirty. The patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed is gone.

 

Something big has shifted. The standing of the administration has changed.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323582904578487460479247792.html

 

 

Disturbing abuses of power

The Justice Department, meanwhile, is in an even deeper hole.

Who can take seriously the department’s mission, as stated by its Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties, “to protect the privacy and civil liberties of the American people”?

 

Media outlets covering D.C. affairs should also be concerned. Journalists who draw on confidential sources while aggressively covering the city’s corruption scandal may now wonder if U.S. Attorney Ronald Machen is going after their phone records. After all, it was Machen’s office that served the subpoenas in the AP case.

 

COINTELPRO? No. Unchecked government power? Yes.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/colbert-king-disturbing-abuses-of-power/2013/05/17/915a7264-bea9-11e2-9b09-1638acc3942e_story.html

 

 

Stay Shocked

So many people are sad about America and cynical about its government. They don’t expect anything good to happen. They think certain poisons have entered the system and nothing can be done about it. Leviathan will not be cut back or tamed, Leviathan will go on abusing the citizen. People are all too willing to believe the Internal Revenue Service is hopelessly political in its judgments and actions. They are not shocked. They don’t think anything can be done, that the system cannot be corrected. They just grip the arms of the seat and wait for the weather to get worse.

 

But cynicism aids and abets deterioration. You’ve got to stay shocked. It’s disrespectful not to.

 

There is such a thing as national morale. Ours could use a boost. People have grown cynical. They expect nothing good to happen. They expect it all to be swept under the rug. They expect no one to pay a price. It is a matter of profound public need that the U.S. government show and prove that it is capable of correcting itself, that Leviathan can stop itself.

 

http://blogs.wsj.com/peggynoonan/2013/05/17/stay-shocked/

 

 

IRS Official in Charge During Tea Party Targeting Now Runs Health Care Office

The Internal Revenue Service official in charge of the tax-exempt organizations at the time when the unit targeted tea party groups now runs the IRS office responsible for the health care legislation.

 

Sarah Hall Ingram served as commissioner of the office responsible for tax-exempt organizations between 2009 and 2012. But Ingram has since left that part of the IRS and is now the director of the IRS’ Affordable Care Act office, the IRS confirmed to ABC News today.

Her successor, Joseph Grant, is taking the fall for misdeeds at the scandal-plagued unit between 2010 and 2012. During at least part of that time, Grant served as deputy commissioner of the tax-exempt unit.

 

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/irs-official-in-charge-during-tea-party-targeting-now-runs-health-care-office/

 

 

‘Is this still America?’ Congressional hearing turns into IRS smackdown as disgraced former commissioner and Treasury Inspector General face tea-party scandal questions
Texas Republican congressman Kevin Brady had the harshest criticism for Miller.

‘Is this still America?’ he asked him.

‘Is this government so drunk on power that it would turn its full force, its full might, to harass, and intimidate, and threaten an average American who only wants her voice, their voices heard?’

‘The American public deserves better,’ Miller agreed. But both he and J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s Inspector General for Tax Administration, insisted that no IRS employees engaged in political witch-hunting.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2326109/Congressional-hearing-turns-IRS-smackdown-disgraced-commissioner-Treasury-Inspector-General-face-tea-party-scandal-questions.html

 

White House should try the Truth:  Redacted truth, subjunctive outrage

Note to GOP re Benghazi: Stop calling it Watergate, Iran-contra, bigger than both, etc. First, it might well be, but we don’t know. History will judge. Second, overhyping will only diminish the importance of the scandal if it doesn’t meet presidency-breaking standards. Third, focusing on the political effects simply plays into the hands of Democrats desperately claiming that this is nothing but partisan politics.

 

Let the facts speak for themselves. They are damning enough…

This could be the first case in presidential history of subjunctive outrage. (It turned into ostensibly real outrage upon later release of the Inspector Generalreport.) Add that to the conditional truths — ever changing, ever fading — of Benghazi, and you have a major credibility crisis.

 

Note to the White House: Try the truth. It’s easier to memorize.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-redacted-truth-subjunctive-outrage/2013/05/16/de28aee8-be64-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_story.html

 

 

Benghazi: What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make?  A lot.

The most transparent administration in history doesn’t like to tell us all that much.

 

And so it is with Benghazi. When the government said it was a spontaneous reaction to unfettered online speech, the media, by and large, believed what officials said. Now the president would like us to believe it’s all just a sideshow, even as important questions remain unanswered. And the most transparent administration in history becomes just a little more transparently not so.

 

http://reason.com/archives/2013/05/14/benghazi-what-difference-at-this-point-d

 

 

Scandals Engulf Obama Administration: White House Denies Knowledge, Responsibility

Early last week, the President of the United States exhorted Ohio State graduates to “reject” the “cynical” voices of those who warn against government abuse and tyranny.  He imparted that advice on May 5.  Less than two weeks later, his administration is aflame with scandal.  Feeding the conflagration is evidence of the executive branch exploiting the levers of government to bully its political opponents and secretly monitor the free press.  These revelations are uniquely suited to stir precisely the sorts of concerns the president attempted to belittle and marginalize in Columbus.  At the risk of engaging in cynicism, let’s examine the latest developments in all four concurrent scandals:

http://townhall.com//tipsheet/guybenson/2013/05/14/scandals-engulf-obama-administration-white-house-denies-knowledge-responsibility-n1594219

 

 

IRS, Benghazi, AP: The Problems Pile Up for Obama
“Americans should take notice that top Obama administration officials increasingly see themselves as above the law and emboldened by the belief that they don’t have to answer to anyone,” House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said in a statement.

 

White House spokesman Jay Carney, asked to comment on Justice’s clandestine data-gathering from the largest global wire service, referred questions to the department.

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/14/irs_benghazi_ap_complaints_pile_up_on_obama_118392.html

 

In IRS scandal, echoes of Watergate

“He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavored to . . . cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be initiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.”

— Article II, Section 1, Articles of Impeachment against Richard M. Nixon, adopted by the House Judiciary Committee, July 29, 1974

 

Episodes like this separate the meritorious liberals from the meretricious. The day after the IRS story broke, The Post led the paper with it, and, with an institutional memory of Watergate, published a blistering editorial demanding an Obama apology. The New York Times consigned the story to page 10 (its front-page lead was the umpteenth story about the end of the world being nigh because of global warming). Through Monday, the Times had expressed no editorial thoughts about the IRS. The Times’s Monday headline on the matter was: “IRS Focus on Conservatives Gives GOP an Issue to Seize On.” So that is the danger.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-irs-scandal-carries-echoes-of-watergate/2013/05/13/78f03660-bbf1-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_story.html

 

 

Benghazi, IRS: Son of Watergate?

The Post’s editorial board writes, “A bedrock principle of U.S. democracy is that the coercive powers of government are never used for partisan purpose.” The board called for a full accounting. I doubt we’ll get it. Take Benghazi.

ABC News first reported that the now famous Benghazi “talking points” used by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice on five Sunday morning news shows were revised 12 times, deleting references to “the al-Qaida-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia (and) CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.”

 

Democrats now accuse Republicans of partisanship, claiming their motive is to damage Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential prospects. If she has nothing to hide, transparency should enhance, not harm, her chances. We’ve learned more about Benghazi since her appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January and she should be asked to account for it.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/sns-201305131600–tms–cthomastq–b-a20130514-20130514,0,3145996.column

 

 

With the IRS Scandal Ablaze, How Does that Special-Prosecutor Thing Work?

If the attorney general suspects criminal wrongdoing within the federal government, he or she can assign a special counsel to lead the investigation. The appointment does not need congressional approval, just notification to the chairman and ranking member of the House and Senate Judiciary committees. The special counsel can be dismissed by the attorney general in extraordinary circumstances, however.

 

The attorney general can either pick a current U.S. attorney or a lawyer from outside the Justice Department; the person must have “a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously, and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies,” according to Justice Department guidelines.

 

When U.S. attorneys are selected to fulfill the functions of a special counsel, such as Patrick Fitzgerald during the Valerie Plame affair, he or she follows many of the same guidelines as outside counsel, with few exceptions with respect to his or her authority.

Once the special counsel is appointed by the attorney general, the person operates under the full authority of the Justice Department and follow its guidelines. Because this is an executive-branch function, Congress cannot appoint a special counsel. Instead, Congress can hold its own investigation through different committees.

 

http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/with-the-irs-scandal-ablaze-how-does-that-special-prosecutor-thing-work-20130515

 

 

Why the GOP thinks it could blow it
“We have to be persistent but patient,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus told us. “I think where there’s smoke, there’s fire. If we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not transparent, is obsessed with power, and hates dissent. But you don’t call for impeachment until you have evidence.”

 

It is important to remember that there is no evidence any of the specific controversies directly link to President Obama himself. No one knows what the various congressional probes will turn up, but until there is a direct connection to the president, the best Republicans can probably do is use the three episodes to illustrate what they see as the dangerous reach — and pervasive incompetence — of the Obama government.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/behind-the-curtain-why-the-gop-thinks-it-could-blow-it-91528.html

 

 

Deflect & Divert Strategy:  Keystone Politics Follow Obama On Baltimore Jobs Tour

“More offense today. We are employing a two part strategy: 1) address each controversy head on, and 2) Pivot from the politics to the substance. On Wednesday, we released the Benghazi talking points emails. Yesterday, we pivoted to substance with POTUS push of new embassy security plan — call the Republicans’ bluff on the politics and push them to our turf on substance. They are at their weakest when pushing political, partisan fights. We are at our strongest when advocating policy that will solve problems people care about. Next case in point: POTUS trip today to Baltimore to talk pre-K and manufacturing. POTUS also moved to appoint career OMB official Danny Werfel — a strong, bipartisan choice — as interim head of IRS. Former Bush boss Josh Bolten gave him props calling Werfel ‘consummately professional, well organized and effective.’”

…and then in other news…

 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/keystone-politics-follow-obama-on-baltimore-jobs-tour

 

 

Obamacare: HEALTHCARE AFFORDABILITY ACT TO INCREASE RATES BY UP TO 400%

Internal cost estimates from 17 of the nation’s largest insurance companies indicate that health insurance premiums will grow an average of 100 percent under Obamacare, and that some will soar more than 400 percent, crushing the administration’s goal of affordability.

 

New regulations, policies, taxes, fees and mandates are the reason for the unexpected “rate shock,” according to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which released a report Monday based on internal documents provided by the insurance companies. The 17 companies include Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield and Kaiser Foundation.

The report concluded what many of us have known since before the bill was passed.

 

 ”Despite promises that the law will lower costs, [Obamacare] will in fact cause the premiums of many Americans to spike substantially. The broken promises are numerous, and the empirical data reveal that many Americans, from recent college graduates to older adults, will not be able to afford the law’s higher costs.”

 

http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/healthcare-affordability-act-to-increase-rates-by-up-to-400/

 

 

Identity, family, marriage: our core conservative values have been betrayed

As the Conservatives strive to heal the divisions in their party it must surely have occurred to them to wonder what the word “conservative”
really means, and why it has had, for so many British people over the past 200 years, such a positive resonance. The important lesson of the local elections is not that the party is losing appeal for marginal groups and floating voters – to whom it never appeals for long in any case. The important lesson is that the party has jeopardised the allegiance of its core constituents, those who willingly describe themselves as conservatives, and live according to the unspoken norms of a shared way of life.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/11/identity-family-marriage-conservative-values-betrayed

 

 

Stay In Touch…Feel Free to Share

My goal is for this to be a weekly political update…sharing political news and analysis that should be of interest to most activists.

 

Please share.

 

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook.

 

On Facebook at:

http://www.facebook.com/sanuzis

 

 

On Twitter at:

@sanuzis

 

 

My blog “That’s Saul Folks” with Weekly Musings & more:

http://thatssaulfolks.com/

 

 

Thanks again for all you do!

 

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

Weekly Musing 5-12-13

Happy Mother’s Day!

 

Weekly Musing 5-12-13

Saul Anuzis

 

 

First, for a few of the MOST important things in life!

 

 

Our “baby” Marius going to prom with his friends from Catholic Central.

 

Go Red Wings!!!

 

 

 

A Coverup Laid Bare

Americans finally got to hear from the State Department officials the Obama administration never wanted to testify. They are now called “whistleblowers,” but that’s only because their accounts of what really happened in Libya on Sept. 11, 2012, were buried by the administration, apparently in the furtherance of Democrats’ election-year imperatives.

Soon after the testimony, Democratic office-holders took to the airwaves and the internet to assure liberal loyalists that there was nothing really “new” here. Republicans, by contrast, trumpeted the accounts of Gregory Hicks, Eric Nordstrom, and Mark Thompson before the House Oversight Committee as proof that the administration never told the truth about Libya.

 

Powerful Ad: The RNC Benghazi Attack Ad that Never Ran

…tells the story!

 

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/exclusive-the-rnc-benghazi-attack-ad-that-never-ran/

 

 

The Inconvenient Truth About Benghazi

Think of that. They can’t give answers when the story’s fresh because it just happened, they’re looking into it. Eight months later they don’t have anything to say because it all happened so long ago.

Think of how low your opinion of the American people has to be to think you can get away, forever, with that.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324244304578473533965297330.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

 

 

The Benghazi Talking Points

And how they were changed to obscure the truth

Even as the White House strove last week to move beyond questions about the Benghazi attacks of Tuesday, September 11, 2012, fresh evidence emerged that senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days following the assaults. The Weekly Standard has obtained a timeline briefed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing the heavy substantive revisions made to the CIA’s talking points, just six weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and additional information about why the changes were made and by whom.

 

It was a preview of the administration’s defense of its claims on Ben­ghazi. After pushing the intelligence community to revise its talking points to fit the administration’s preferred narrative, administration officials would point fingers at the intelligence community when parts of that narrative were shown to be misleading or simply untrue.

 

http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/articles/benghazi-talking-points_720543.html

 

 

Graduates, Your Ambition Is the Problem –

Obama’s commencement speech at Ohio State on Sunday would have perplexed the Founders.

Civic education in America took a hit on Sunday when President Obama, giving the commencement address at The Ohio State University, chose citizenship as his theme. The country’s Founders trusted citizens with “awesome authority,” he told the assembled graduates. Really?

Actually, the Founders distrusted us, at least in our collective capacity. That’s why they wrote a Constitution that set clear limits on what we, as citizens, could do through government.

 

Mr. Obama seems never to appreciate that essential point about the American political order. As with his countless speeches that lead ultimately to an expression of the president’s belief in the unbounded power of government to do good, he began in Columbus with an insight that we can all pretty much embrace, at least in the abstract. Citizenship, Mr. Obama said, is “the idea at the heart of our founding—that as Americans, we are blessed with God-given and inalienable rights, but with those rights come responsibilities—to ourselves, to one another, and to future generations.”

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323372504578468772717864406.html

 

 

Legalized Fraud??? Democrats, Voting Rights Activists Strike Back on Elections Laws

Republicans several years ago seized the upper hand in the so-called “voting wars” by pushing voter ID and other measures that created new voting restrictions. But now Democrats across the country are fighting back.

This week, Colorado lawmakers sent Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, a bill that allows voters in that state to register at the polls on Election Day; creates an all-mail ballot system; and ensures that voters who move within Colorado don’t have to re-register at their new address. The Colorado law is especially broad, but it is only the latest in a series of victories for those who want to streamline registration and reduce long lines at the polls. The governor is expected to sign the measure, which has overwhelming support among Democrats.

 

http://www.pewstates.org/projects/stateline/headlines/democrats-voting-rights-activists-strike-back-on-elections-laws-85899475147

 

Who is the real Gary Peters?

The millionaire former Merrill Lynch financial advisor donned a “We are the 99 Percent” button and marched up Woodward Avenue amidst angry unionists, anarchists and class warriors. Last week, the self-described political “moderate” and “independent” launched his campaign to fill the Senate seat of retiring Carl Levin. But if he is a centrist, why does Peters provoke such unusual disdain from even moderate Republicans?

His Occupy Detroit alliance is a glimpse at the real Gary Peters — an ideologically liberal politician who will do anything to stay in power.
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130507/OPINION03/305070313/Who-real-Gary-Peters-?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|s

 

 

Republican Young Guns Eye 2016

Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz each ascended to the U.S. Senate by riding a grassroots wave of enthusiasm to defeat the Republican Party establishment’s preferred candidate in a contested primary.

Now, still in the first half of their first terms, all three young conservatives are already taking steps toward 2016 presidential runs.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/06/in_gop_presidential_politics_does_experience_matter_118256.html

 

 

IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups

The Internal Revenue Service inappropriately flagged conservative political groups for additional reviews during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status, a top IRS official said Friday.

Organizations were singled out because they included the words “tea party” or “patriot” in their applications for tax-exempt status, said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups.

In some cases, groups were asked for their list of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said.

 

“That was wrong. That was absolutely incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate. That’s not how we go about selecting cases for further review,” Lerner said at a conference sponsored by the American Bar Association.

 

“The IRS would like to apologize for that,” she added.

 

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/irs-apologizes-targeting-conservative-groups

 

 

IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, confirming long-standing accusations by some conservatives that their applications for tax-exempt status were being improperly delayed and scrutinized.

 

Lois G. Lerner, the IRS official who oversees tax-exempt groups, said the “absolutely inappropriate” actions by “front-line people” were not driven by partisan motives.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/irs-admits-targeting-conservatives-for-tax-scrutiny-in-2012-election/2013/05/10/3b6a0ada-b987-11e2-92f3-f291801936b8_story.html

 

Obama uses 2012 campaign tactics to sell healthcare law

Seeking to ensure his landmark healthcare law is successfully implemented, President Obama is reprising his 2012 election strategy in hopes of enrolling millions of uninsured Americans in health plans this fall.

The new campaign, whose outcome could largely shape the president’s legacy, is targeting young people, Latinos and women — groups that were crucial to Obama’s victory in November.

 

It will rely on some of the same tools that the reelection campaign pioneered for voter turnout, including extensive use of social media, mobilization of volunteers and data-driven outreach.

 

Even some of the same strategists are playing central roles, including Obama’s former campaign manager Jim Messina. Messina heads Organizing for Action, the grass-roots nonprofit group that evolved out of Obama’s campaign. The group has made enrolling uninsured Americans in health coverage a top priority.

The president, who faces rising anxiety from Democrats that a messy rollout could be politically disastrous for the party in the 2014 midterm election, tried again to reassure his supporters Friday.

 

http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-obama-healthcare-20130511,0,1279840,print.story

 

 

Ted Cruz Seeks to Ban Illegal Immigrants in U.S. from Citizenship

“The amendments filed today to strengthen border security and reform our legal immigration system will not only bring meaningful, effective improvements to our immigration system, but also have a chance of becoming law,” said Cruz in a press release. “America is a nation of immigrants, built by immigrants and we need to honor that heritage by fixing our broken immigration system, while upholding the rule of law and championing legal immigration.”

 

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/05/08/ted-cruz-seeks-to-ban-illegal-immigrants-in-us-from-citizenship

 

 

The Republican dilemma on a map – An Interesting Analysis

We are years away from learning who will run in the 2016 race, but we already know one thing for certain ― the Republican nominee will start that campaign trailing in the Electoral College.

 

The party’s built in Electoral College deficit rises from a Republican strategy to concentrate our appeal in an ever-narrowing swath of the country. The map tells a tale of alarming geographic polarization that is beginning to threaten the party’s national relevance.

 

This regionalism is a fairly recent development. Only 28 years ago Ronald Reagan swept 49 states and won 57 percent of the popular vote on the strength of a broad coalition that spanned traditional party boundaries. When that coalition began to break it led to Republican losses in some unprecedented places.

 

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/just-enough-city/2013/may/6/republican-dilemma-map/

 

 

Rise of the Republican Governors

A new liberal era? Not according to these reformers.

Since Obama first took office in 2008, Republicans have picked up a net nine governorships, bringing their total to 30 states, which hold nearly 184 million Americans. In 24 of those states, containing 157 million Americans, Republicans also control the legislatures. Democrats boast similar power in just 12 states, with a population of 100 million. Even Republicans’ unimpressive national showing last November didn’t reverse their state-level momentum.

 

http://www.city-journal.org/2013/23_2_republican-governors.html

 

 

When Will America Burst D.C.’s Bubble?

The centralized power and wealth in our nation’s capital are becoming so disconnected from the rest of this country that it is palpable to everyone except those who live in Washington.

 

In most people’s lives, the driving issue is economic security. Washington’s obsession is with social and cultural issues that drive bigger wedges between Us and Them.

 

It’s only a matter of time before the rest of America’s complaints will burst Washington’s bubble.

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/05/thriving_dcs_bubble_will_burst_118261.html

 

 

Information on the debate over “Common Core” – a classic state’s rights issue

The Common Core agenda aims to frame the educational paradigm with a progressive agenda worldview, limit parental involvement in order to take control of students within the system, and even record children’s personal data into a database (religion, etc) so they can follow your child as they grow – beyond their classroom.

 

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=g7farlcab&v=0019AZp80hh5E77d1prGQLygK6r3Uw7rH8yAFcKng5wRRJfsWnM21OD4P4_-BBN-yfzuQvlydDqJtxD2jRsGoVNHEZSeaG_6ltmH-wFD_BLs0QvBmEbAt-qMA%3D%3D

 

 

Muzzling free speech about taxes

Government is violating one of the natural rights that the Founders said government is “instituted” (the Declaration’s word) to protect. This episode confirms conservatism’s premise that today’s government is guilty of shabby behavior until proven innocent. And conservatives enable such behavior when their unreflective denunciations of judicial “activism” encourage excessive judicial deference toward the modern executive’s impetuous vortex.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-f-will-the-government-puts-a-limit-on-free-speech-about-taxes/2013/03/29/8926f1ec-b348-11e2-bbf2-a6f9e9d79e19_story.html

 

 

 

Syria: The Only Red Line Should Be To Stay Out

Syria is a civil war, not genocide.  The killings are awful, but that is what happens in low-tech conflicts.  Two sides, with the military balance steadily equalizing, are battling for control of the country.  Such a struggle is unlikely to have a good outcome, whoever prevails.

 

Indeed, Syria’s two sides reflect the stark choice that Washington has faced throughout the Arab Spring.  One side is stable dictatorship.  The other side is a messy mix of democrats and authoritarians, in which the most radical elements are gaining influence if not control.  Even if regime opponents win, the fighting is not likely to stop.  Rather, Assad’s ouster would merely trigger combat over who would win control of the Syrian government, and whether there would even be a Syrian government in control of the entire country.  Reprisals against regime supporters and religious minorities would be likely.

 

…Moreover, legally President Obama cannot act alone.  The Constitution does not empower any president to start wars on his own authority.  Explained Walter Pincus of the Washington Post:  “There’s no [UN] resolution for Syria. Without one, or without Congress approving a Syrian resolution, there is no legal basis for U.S. forces striking Syrian targets.”  But why would legislators facing multiple domestic crises want to plunge America into another unnecessary conflict?

 

The Syrian civil war will end badly. 

Unfortunately, the U.S. can’t make it end any better.  Washington should stay out of the conflict.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougbandow/2013/04/29/syria-the-only-red-line-should-be-to-stay-out/

 

China may not overtake America this century after all

Doubts are growing about whether China can pass the US to become the world’s biggest economy this century amid warnings that the country’s 30-year miracle is nearing exhaustion.

 

The report warned that China’s 30-year miracle is nearing exhaustion. The low-hanging fruit of state-driven industrialisation and reliance on cheap exports has already been picked. Stagnation looms unless Beijing embraces the free market and relaxes its suffocating grip over the economy. “Innovation at the technology frontier is quite different in nature from catching up technologically. It is not something that can be achieved through government planning,” it said.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/10044456/China-may-not-overtake-America-this-century-after-all.html

 

 

The Meaning Inside the Political Numbers

All of this analysis points to a robust competition between the two parties over the past two decades, with no permanent winners or losers and no emerging natural majority for either party.

 

Neither party is doomed; both face challenges. Republicans have a clear problem with Hispanic voters, and many Republicans, including several with presidential aspirations, are addressing it by supporting immigration reform. House Republicans, only two of them from Hispanic-dominated districts, seem less interested.

 

Democrats have a clear problem with clustering. They cannot expect to improve on their performance with black voters in the two Obama elections, and they need to expand their appeal beyond their clusters of support to win congressional majorities. That may be difficult since their party tends to be defined, as it was not in the breakout years of 2006 and 2008, by a liberal incumbent president.

 

Republicans are trying to do something about their problems. Democrats, with their man in the White House, seem more complacent. But both parties have reason to feel insecure.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628004578461302387618518.html#

 

 

The Coming GOP Civil War Over Climate Change

Republicans have been struggling with an identity crisis since the 2012 presidential election. In particular, the nation’s rapid demographic changes are forcing the GOP to come to terms with the newly powerful influence of Hispanic voters and to confront the issue of immigration. For now, climate change isn’t getting anywhere close to that kind of urgent scrutiny from Republicans, at least not in public. GOP strategists say that Republican candidates hoping to win primary races, where the electorate tends to be older and more ideologically driven, are still best served to deny, ignore, or dismiss climate change.

 

http://mobile.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-coming-gop-civil-war-over-climate-change-20130509

 

 

How a Bill Becomes a Mess

 

As Jonathon Martin puts it,  “A step-by-step look at the gruesome business of legislating, taking the 2010 Dodd-Frank bill as a case study.”

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323372504578468752016929098.html

 

Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy: A Righteous Gentile vs. the Third Reich

By Eric Metaxas, from the “New York Times-”bestselling author of “Amazing Grace” comes a groundbreaking biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the greatest heroes of the 20th century, a man who stood up to Hitler and the monstrous evil that was Nazism. As a double-agent, he joined the plot to assassinate the Fuhrer, and was hanged in Flossenberg concentration camp.

 

A great book.

 

Stay In Touch…Feel Free to Share

My goal is for this to be a weekly political update…sharing political news and analysis that should be of interest to most activists.

 

Please share.

 

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook.

 

On Facebook at:

http://www.facebook.com/sanuzis

 

 

On Twitter at:

@sanuzis

 

 

My blog “That’s Saul Folks” with Weekly Musings & more:

http://thatssaulfolks.com/

 

 

Thanks again for all you do!

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

Weekly Musiing 5-5-13

 

Weekly Musing 5-5-13

Saul Anuzis

 ”Everything real violent criminals do to acquire a firearm is already a serious federal felony”. 

- Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of the National Rifle Association

 

NRA Credentials

At the NRA Convention in Houston this Weekend

It’s estimated that over 100,000 patriots from around the country will gather this weekend in Houston to stand up for our 2nd Amendment rights.  The place is packed with excitement and optimism, with a renewed priority to protect our Constitutional form of government and the rights it provides it’s citizens.

 

The exhibit hall is packed with vendors and participants and they share their latest products, services and show their wares.  It’s funny, one question I’ve heard over and over again is “can I get ammo for this gun”J  Apparently Americans continue to “stack up” their reserves in fear of what the Obama Administration will try next.

 

A great event any gun owner,hunter or supporter of the 2nd Amendment should participate in at least once in their lifetime…if not annually!

 

Pearls of wisdom…

  We   hang petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.
~Aesop, Greek slave & fable author

Those   who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by     those who are dumber.
~Plato,   ancient Greek Philosopher

Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where
there   is no river.
~Nikita Khrushchev, Russian Soviet   politician

When I   was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I’m
beginning to believe it.
~Quoted in ‘Clarence Darrow for the Defense’ by   Irving Stone.

Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, go
out   and buy some more tunnel.
~John   Quinton, American actor/writer

Politics is the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds
from   the rich, by promising to protect each from the other.
~Oscar   Ameringer, “the Mark Twain of   American Socialism.”

I   offered my opponents a deal: “if they stop telling lies about me, I     will
stop   telling the truth about them”.
~Adlai   Stevenson, campaign speech, 1952..

A   politician is a fellow who will lay down your life for his country.
~Texas   Guinan. 19th century American businessman

I have   come to the conclusion that politics is too serious a matter to be
left   to the politicians.
~Charles de Gaulle, French general &   politician

Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to
change   the locks.
~Doug   Larson (English middle-distance runner who won gold medals at the 1924   Olympic Games in Paris, 1902-1981)

 

 

About Those Conservative ‘Squishes’

The GOP is split between those who insist on making a point, and those who want to make some progress.

 

Take our orders, or we will brand you a RINO in a primary.

 

These days, the squishes apparently include groups like Americans for Tax Reform and FreedomWorks, which supported the pre-existing conditions bill. They include rock-ribbed conservatives like Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, who did not join the gun filibuster threat—issued before the bill was written. “I’ve done more filibusters than Rand Paul is old,” said Mr. Coburn at the time—adding that his rule is to first read what he’s filibustering.

 

These groups are sincere in their belief that only by standing on principle can the party draw a sharp distinction with Mr. Obama. Yet it is, after all, possible to be both principled and . . . smart! It is principled to allow a congressional debate on guns (what is the GOP afraid of?), and smart to let Democrats own their gun failure. It is principled to chip away at ObamaCare, and smart to force Democrats to help do it.

Mr. Obama is betting the GOP keeps running into his fixed bayonets, shouting “repeal!” with their last, spent breath. The real debate within the GOP right now is whether battles might not be better won with canny flanking maneuvers. Bear that in mind next time someone hollers “squish.”

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/potomac_watch.html

 

 

Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz’s red-meat Republicanism

With this litany of conservative touchstones and more, Cruz drew round after round of applause Friday night here at the South Carolina GOP’s Silver Elephant Dinner, an annual fundraising event that routinely hosts aspiring presidential candidates.

 

It remains to be seen whether Cruz’s keynote speech represents an early step toward seeking the presidency.

 

What it was, for now, was one more successful stop on the rubber-chicken circuit for a Republican who has become a master of political dinner theater with an act that should give real pause to party bigwigs who think a remodeled GOP 2.0 is just around the corner.

 

Every Drudge-linked, Fox-hyped, Rush-endorsed zinger a Republican county activist could want – Cruz delivered it here.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/ted-cruz-republicans-2016-90913.html

 

 

The GOP Sets Its Sights on the Senate in 2014

Of the 35 Senate seats up for grabs next year, 21 are held by Democrats, 14 by Republicans. Six Democratic seats are in states (W. Va., Ark., S.D., Louisiana, Alaska and Mont.) that Mitt Romney won by at least 10%. Only one Republican seat is in a state (Maine) that President Obama won by more than 10%.

 

A GOP pickup of even three or four Senate seats would produce big changes. The ratio between Democrats and Republicans on committees would shift, and Republicans would be more likely to cobble together a majority on issues like spending and defense policy. Not every Democrat wants to go over the liberal cliff with Mr. Obama.

 

To take control of the Senate, however, Republicans must win a net of six seats. They won that many seats in 2010 but lost two seats in 2012, leaving the Democrats with a 53-45 margin today (independents Bernie Sanders in Vermont and Angus King of Maine caucus with the Democrats.)

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324266904578456652913658748.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

 

 

ObamaFrown

Obama’s ‘Fairness’ Economy Has Backfired

The left’s answer to this accelerating disparity under Obama will, no doubt, be more regulatory burdens, more tax hikes (the president is still obsessed with closing loopholes on private jets — a rounding error, in his budget), more deficit spending and more programs that smooth over all the unjust vagaries of life. Most often, these solutions erect barriers to mobility for small businesses and entrepreneurs — the types of people who help alter the dynamics of mobility. Despite what you may hear, more revenue for government doesn’t create wealth. A freer economy and more societal stability do.

 

If Americans believe that government should promote opportunity and mobility and not equality of outcomes, as this administration claims, allowing more economic freedom would not leave us hapless in the face of unregulated anarchy. It would do the opposite. It would invite more innovation and more opportunity.

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/02/obamas_fairness_economy_has_backfired_118217.html

 

 

Power Constrains – Why “community organizer” tactics don’t work for the president.

Unlike Alinsky’s threat to disrupt air travel, Obama’s was at least partly carried out. But like Alinsky’s threat, Obama’s threat caused the administration to cave in–though unlike Alinsky’s threat, its purpose was the opposite.

 

Power constrains because it entails responsibility, and Alinskyite tactics are designed to take advantage of those constraints for the benefit of the powerless. Such tactics have backfired on Obama repeatedly because he seems not to understand that they are ill-suited to power politics.

The gun-control failure is another example. Here’s how a Washington Post piece describes what went wrong:

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324482504578452882242125290?mg=reno64-wsj.html?dsk=y

 

 

Mitch McConnell Wants to Be the Republican Party’s Chief Tech Innovator

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has set an ambitious goal for his reelection campaign: to build the most sophisticated Republican digital and data operation to date.

 

The Kentucky Republican, known more as tactician than technologist, is making a major investment in technology infrastructure in hopes that a treasure trove of real-time data about the electorate will help guide him to a sixth term.

 

http://www.nationaljournal.com//politics/mitch-mcconnell-wants-to-be-the-republican-party-s-chief-tech-innovator-20130429

 

 

The Coming ObamaCare Shock: Millions of Americans will pay more for health insurance, lose their coverage, or have their hours of work cut back.

In recent weeks, there have been increasing expressions of concern from surprising quarters about the implementation of ObamaCare. Montana Sen. Max Baucus, a Democrat, called it a “train wreck.” A Democratic colleague, West Virginia’s Sen. Jay Rockefeller, described the massive Affordable Care Act as “beyond comprehension.” Henry Chao, the government’s chief technical officer in charge of putting in place the insurance exchanges mandated by the law, was quoted in the Congressional Quarterly as saying “I’m pretty nervous . . . Let’s just make sure it’s not a third-world experience.”

These individuals are worried for good reason. The unpopular health-care law’s rollout is going to be rough. It will also administer several price (and other) shocks to tens of millions of Americans.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324874204578441032081716170.html

 

 

Could Kirsten Gillibrand run for president?

Since then, the 46-year-old Dartmouth-educated attorney has demonstrated impressive political chops. She has managed not only to ease liberals’ misgivings about her but also to win their enthusiastic support — all while maintaining her moderate cred and doing the kind of behind-the-scenes political scut work that could enable an eventual national bid.

“I find her to be very impressive,” said the champion of the left circa 2004, Howard Dean. “She often underwhelms people at first sight, [but] when you look under the hood, you find a first-class political mind and someone who has a great deal of skill.”

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html

 

 

The Fight for Millennials – Democrats think they have the youth vote locked up. Think again.

President Obama carried the 18-to-29-year-old voting bloc by 34 points in 2008 and by 23 points last year. But a new national survey of millennial voters conducted by Harvard’s Institute of Politics suggests this emerging generation might not be as locked into the Democratic camp as conventional wisdom suggests, and that young voters exhibit some of the same stark partisan divides as older Americans.

 

In the study of 3,013 millennials, conducted online by GfK, Obama’s job approval was at 52 percent, with a disapproval rate of 46 percent (the poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.7 percentage points). That is only slightly better than the Huffington Post/Pollster.com averages and the RealClearPolitics.com averages of all national polls among Americans over 18 years of age, both of which show 48 percent approval and 47 percent disapproval.

 

At the same time, the gap between those young voters who consider themselves Democrats and those who identify more with the Republican Party is the size of the Grand Canyon, just as it is with older generations. Among Democrats ages 18-29, Obama enjoys an 85 percent approval rating, but among Republicans in that same age cohort, his approval rating is just 11 percent, a 74-point difference, compared with a 63-point difference in the same survey a year ago.

 

http://www.nationaljournal.com//columns/cook-report/the-fight-for-millennials-20130502

 

 

ObamaMexicanFlag

Winning Hispanic vote would not be enough for GOP

It is simply not reasonable to believe there is something the GOP can do — pass immigration reform, juice up voter-outreach efforts — that will create that result.

 

That doesn’t mean future Republican presidential candidates should not work to increase their share of the Hispanic vote. They could, for example, actually campaign in areas with large numbers of Hispanic voters.

 

But here is the real solution. Romney lost because he did not appeal to the millions of Americans who have seen their standard of living decline over the past decades. They’re nervous about the future. When Romney did not address their concerns, they either voted for Obama or didn’t vote at all. If the next Republican candidate can address their concerns effectively, he will win. And, amazingly enough, he’ll win a lot more Hispanic votes in the process. A lot from other groups, too.

 

http://washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-winning-hispanic-vote-would-not-be-enough-for-gop/article/2528730

 

 

Southern Whites’ Shift to the GOP Predates the ’60s
Two civil rights bills pushed by the Eisenhower administration had cleared Congress, and the administration was pushing forward with the Brown decision, most famously by sending the 101st Airborne Division to Arkansas to assist with the integration of Little Rock Central High School.

It’s impossible to separate race and economics completely anywhere in the country, perhaps least of all in the South. But the inescapable truth is that the GOP was making its greatest gains in the South while it was also pushing a pro-civil rights agenda nationally. What was really driving the GOP at this time was economic development. As Southern cities continued to develop and sprout suburbs, Southern exceptionalism was eroded; Southern whites simply became wealthy enough to start voting Republican.

 

…But the assertion that white Southerners began voting Republican in 1964 is simply incorrect, whether for president, Congress, or statehouses. The development of the Southern GOP was a slow-moving, gradual process that lasted over a century, and is just being completed today.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/30/southern_whites_shift_to_the_gop_predates_the_60s_118172.html

 

 

Michigan’s Wayne Bradley interviews RNC Chairman Reince Priebus

 

https://soundcloud.com/waynebradleyshow/one-on-one-with-wayne-bradley-and-reince-priebus

 

 

Immigration Bill Gives Amnestied Residents ‘Immediate’ Access to Welfare

The immigration bill introduced to the Senate a week and a half ago would, if passed, allow illegal immigrants to access state and local welfare benefits immediately, Breitbart News has learned. The financial impact of allowing potentially millions of immigrants onto state and local public assistance could overwhelm these programs’ budgets.

 

If the bill were signed into law, America’s 11 million illegal immigrants would be legalized within six months, when Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano submits her border security plan to Congress. Illegal immigrants would immediately be eligible for Registered Provisional Immigrant (RPI) status, making them legal to live and work in the country.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/29/Exclusive-Immigration-bill-would-load-immediate-fiscal-burden-onto-state-local-governments-by-allowing-illegal-immigrants-onto-welfare

 

 

Stay In Touch…Feel Free to Share

My goal is for this to be a weekly political update…sharing political news and analysis that should be of interest to most activists.

 

Please share.

 

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook.

 

On Facebook at:

http://www.facebook.com/sanuzis

 

 

On Twitter at:

@sanuzis

 

 

My blog “That’s Saul Folks” with Weekly Musings & more:

http://thatssaulfolks.com/

 

 

Thanks again for all you do!

 

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

About Those Conservative ‘Squishes’

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/potomac_watch.html

 

About Those Conservative ‘Squishes’

The GOP is split between those who insist on making a point, and those who want to make some progress.

 

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz recently gave a speech to some FreedomWorks activists, delivering a fascinating retelling of the Senate gun-control fight. After taking credit for killing the bill with his filibuster threat, Mr. Cruz went on to divide the Republican caucus between those who have “principles” and those who are “a bunch of squishes.”

This is one way to divvy up the GOP caucus, though it is a largely false (and self-serving) construction. The real divisions in today’s Republican Party are not so much over ideology as they are over strategy. The GOP is split between those who insist on making a point, and those who want to make some progress.

Take the gun fight. A month ago, the president’s gun package was in tatters. The GOP had sat back and let Democratic infighting claim the spotlight. The headlines were about how Mr. Obama’s proposals for an “assault weapons” ban, and magazine-capacity limits, and universal background checks were all about to die—at the hands of his own Senate Democrats.

Into this perfect Democratic storm flew Mr. Cruz, Kentucky’s Rand Paul and Utah’s Mike Lee, vowing to filibuster any bill that undermined Second Amendment rights. Heritage Action promised to “score” against any Republican that didn’t join them. Had this tactic succeeded, it would only have shielded Democrats from owning their gun failure. President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid were thrilled to turn the headlines for the next week to Republican “obstructionism.”

This was never about the principled versus the squishes. The Cruz faction wanted to make a point—to prove (as if anyone doubted it) that the GOP believes in the “Constitution.” The Republicans voting to proceed to a debate and votes wanted a political win, exposing Democratic divisions and forcing Mr. Obama to take sole responsibility for the defeat of his first second-term agenda item.

Enlarge Image

 

Close

Corbis

Or take last week’s House fight over a Republican bill to drain ObamaCare’s $5 billion slush fund. The Obama team is moving to grab those dollars and use them to prop up its failing insurance exchanges. The GOP bill would have moved the money to a separate ObamaCare program that is currently failing in its promise to help Americans with pre-existing conditions.

Republicans were going to force Democrats to choose between sick people and their fun money. As such, their bill had a real shot at getting Democrats themselves to kill off a piece of ObamaCare, as the GOP took credit for helping the sick people who President Obama has failed. This would have been progress, both on policy and politics.

But the absolutists wanted to make a point: Republicans must not vote for any legislation, ever, that might tacitly underpin, in any way, any aspect of ObamaCare—even a program for the sick. Full repeal, or nothing! Mr. Cruz’s staff trashed it. Heritage Action slammed it. The Club for Growth misrepresented what it would do and threatened to score the vote. House leaders pulled it.

So Mr. Obama keeps his slush money—to prop up his failing exchanges, enroll more Americans and fund his liberal activist groups—making it harder to ever dismantle the bill. But hey, at least Americans get “the point.” Altogether now, and once more for the ages: The GOP wants to repeal ObamaCare.

Next up, debt-ceiling fight.

The dishonest part is the way in which today’s self-anointed arbiters of “conservatism” cast these disputes over strategy in ideological terms. The vast majority of today’s Republicans are in fact ardent defenders of the Second Amendment, passionate about repealing ObamaCare, in favor of lower taxes. The big disagreements are over how best to accomplish these aims.

Yet disagree with Mr. Cruz on his filibuster strategy, and you are a “squish.” Take a different line from the Club for Growth on pre-existing conditions (or any of its poorly vetted Senate candidates), and you are “the establishment.” Think slightly different than Jim DeMint—now at Heritage, serving as maestro of the rebel orchestra—and you are not “conservative.” These terms are used with great calculation. Take our orders, or we will brand you a RINO in a primary.

These days, the squishes apparently include groups like Americans for Tax Reform and FreedomWorks, which supported the pre-existing conditions bill. They include rock-ribbed conservatives like Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, who did not join the gun filibuster threat—issued before the bill was written. “I’ve done more filibusters than Rand Paul is old,” said Mr. Coburn at the time—adding that his rule is to first read what he’s filibustering.

These groups are sincere in their belief that only by standing on principle can the party draw a sharp distinction with Mr. Obama. Yet it is, after all, possible to be both principled and . . . smart! It is principled to allow a congressional debate on guns (what is the GOP afraid of?), and smart to let Democrats own their gun failure. It is principled to chip away at ObamaCare, and smart to force Democrats to help do it.

Mr. Obama is betting the GOP keeps running into his fixed bayonets, shouting “repeal!” with their last, spent breath. The real debate within the GOP right now is whether battles might not be better won with canny flanking maneuvers. Bear that in mind next time someone hollers “squish.”

 

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

Weekly Musing 4-28-13

Weekly Musing 4-28-13

Saul Anuzis

 

“Can you imagine how much the government would know if they learned from their mistakes”?

—Dr Ben Carson this week in Macomb County

 

R.I.P. John Long

This last week we lost a good friend and long-time party activist and operative John Long.  After a long fight with cancer, he passed away this week after falling into a coma.  John served as a key operative in the Republican Revolution in Michigan at both the state and national levels.  He was a mentor, friend and ally to many.  Our thoughts and prayers go out to his family.

 

 

Pam Posthumus Signature Auction event May 8th

I’m looking forward to it again this year!!! I hope you can join us…for Michigan’s kids!  Doors open 5pm at the Lansing Center

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvqxjiC3MFQ&feature=share

 

 

GOP faces Senate recruitment woes in key states

Republicans are struggling to recruit strong U.S. Senate candidates in states where the party has the best chances to reclaim the majority in Washington.

 

It’s a potentially troubling sign that the GOP’s post-2012 soul-searching could spill over into next year’s congressional elections.

The vote is more than 18 months away, so it’s early. But candidate recruitment efforts are well underway, and thus far Republicans have been unable to field a top-tier candidate in Iowa or Michigan.

 

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/gop-faces-senate-recruitment-woes-key-states

 

 

Make Government Less Taxing

Americans don’t like things that are inefficient, costly or unfair. Our federal tax code seems designed to be all three, a failing exacerbated by a patchwork of economically distorting subsidies and preferences found throughout the code and elsewhere.

 

In a 2009 survey by the Tax Foundation, more than 80% of respondents felt the tax code was complex and that it should be completely overhauled or needed major changes. The only surprise about this result is that 20% could think otherwise.

 

…Fixing the tax code to make it encourage instead of discourage economic growth is critical for our nation’s long-term success as it competes in the world economy. Cutting Washington’s wasteful counterproductive efforts to take taxpayer dollars and hand them out to favored constituencies will not fully solve our deficit problem, but it would help. Putting the two together would be a strong start in solving our nation’s economic problems and making our system efficient, cost effective, and fair.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323789704578445283715361550.html

 

Obama’s Gamesmanship an OUTRAGE!  Flying the Government Skies

Start with the Federal Aviation Administration, better known as the Postal Service without the modern technology. Flyers directly fund two-thirds of the FAA’s budget through 17 airline taxes and fees—about 20% of the cost of a $300 domestic ticket, up from 7% in the 1970s. Yet now the White House wants to make this agency that can’t deliver what passengers are supposedly paying for even more dysfunctional.

 

Ponder this logic, if that’s the right word: The sequester cuts about $637 million from the FAA, which is less than 4% of its $15.9 billion 2012 budget, and it limits the agency to what it spent in 2010. The White House decided to translate this 4% cut that it has the legal discretion to avoid into a 10% cut for air traffic controllers. Though controllers will be furloughed for one of every 10 working days, four of every 10 flights won’t arrive on time.

The FAA projects the delays will rob one out of every three travellers of up to four hours of their lives waiting at the major hubs. Congress passed a law in 2009 that makes such delays illegal, at least if they are the responsibility of an airline. Under President Obama’s “passenger bill of rights,” the carriers are fined millions of dollars per plane that sits on the tarmac for more than three hours. But sauce for the goose is apparently an open bar for the FAA gander.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323735604578440981119902460.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

 

 

What does Jeb Bush want?

No one doubts that if he ran, Jeb would start the race as the GOP frontrunner by dint of his record as governor, his policy chops and the power that his last name conveys in Republican politics. And yet, his last name is freighted with problems as well. Not only is his brother still viewed disapprovingly by a majority of the country but the idea of a third president from the same family might not sit all that well with voters. (That includes Barbara Bush, by the way; “We’ve had enough Bushes,” she told Lauer.)

Then there is Jeb himself who seems to be wrestling with whether he wants to re-enter the political arena.  Bush and his allies note that he is, by nature, a policy guy who doesn’t enjoy the back and forth nature of modern American politics. But, Bush has done enough over the past few months — including refusing to rule out a run — to suggest that he is, at the very least entertaining the idea of running.

 

The race with Jeb is a very different one than the race without him. (We believe that if Jeb runs, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio doesn’t.)  But, the contradictions and conflicting signals make it impossible to know just where he fits in (or doesn’t).

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/26/what-does-jeb-bush-want/

 

Dave Camp to brief House Republicans on tax reform

New committee polling, shared with POLITICO, backs that up, and shows that Camp and House Republican leadership are planning to argue that taxpayers are getting fleeced, while large corporations are taken care of. More than 80 percent of Americans agree with the following statements: “the complexity of the tax code benefits corporations and special interests who can afford lawyers and accountants at the expense of average taxpayers”; “the complexity of our tax code hurts the economy” and “I’m more angry about how Washington spends my money than I am about the amount of money they take in taxes.”

 

The poll found that this statement was also supported by upward of 80 percent of respondents: “We need a tax code that protects taxpayers, not special interests, by creating a simpler, fairer code without all the loopholes.”

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/camp-to-brief-house-republicans-on-tax-reform-90540.html

 

Candice Miller implements Boehner-led cost-cutting saving millions in the House

“Believe me, I am totally aware that there is no sympathy for members of Congress. However, I think we should lead by example,” said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., a Detroit-area congresswoman who chairs the committee that oversees internal budget cuts.

 

Leading Democrats have chafed at the belt tightening, arguing it undermines adequate personnel resources for research and oversight. “We are past the point of cutting what we want, and we are now into cutting what we need — our ability to attract and retain expert staff,” said Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pa., in opposition to further committee cuts approved in March.

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/24/boehner-millions-house-savings-budget/2106435/

 

 

Immigration reform could be bonanza for Democrats

The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.

 

Beneath the philosophical debates about amnesty and border security, there are brass-tacks partisan calculations driving the thinking of lawmakers in both parties over comprehensive immigration reform, which in its current form offers a pathway to citizenship — and full voting rights — for a group of undocumented residents that roughly equals the population of Ohio, the nation’s seventh-largest state.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/immigration-reform-could-upend-electoral-college-90478.html?hp=t1

 

 

The language of terror

Obama has performed admirably during the Boston crisis, speaking both reassuringly and with determination.

But he continues to be linguistically uneasy.

His wavering over the word terrorism is telling, though in this case unimportant. The real test will come when we learn the motive for the attack.

 

http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=310726

 

 

Lessons from Boston and Chechnya – On Islam, Evil, Liberals, and Happiness

One of the greatest insights I learned as a young man came from reading Viktor Frankl’s seminal work, “Man’s Search for Meaning.” Frankl was a Jewish psychoanalyst who survived Auschwitz, where nearly every member of his family, including his wife, was murdered. His conclusion: “There are two races of men in this world but only these two. The race of the decent man and the race of the indecent man.”

 

Those “races” do not understand one another. But more important than understanding the indecent is overpowering and, when necessary, destroying the indecent.

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/23/lessons_from_boston_and_chechnya_118082.html

 

 

Boston Marathon bombing lesson – political correctness kills
America is facing a jihadist enemy. It is an enemy that has proven it can inflict more civilian casualties on the United States than any other foreign enemy in almost 200 years.

 

Just last week this enemy killed 3 innocent people, wounded more than 100 and paralyzed a major American city.

 

Yet, our obsession with political correctness, with a strong desire not to offend our enemies makes our self-defense immeasurably more difficult.

The evil nature and intentions of our jihadist enemies are already clear. They hate us enough to pack pressure cookers with ball bearings, to hijack airliners and turn them into weapons of mass destruction, to wear underwear bombs, shoe bombs, and any other kind of bomb they can smuggle onto aircraft.

 

Yet we still can’t face facts.  Consider these recent events:

 

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/04/23/boston-marathon-bombing-lesson-political-correctness-kills/

 

 

A sad example of Freedom of Speech going too far!  US imam calls on Muslims in US to wage jihad

The controversial imam of a prominent mosque in Arlington, Va., has urged immigrant Muslims in the United States to wage war for Islam.

“The enemies of Allah are lining up. The question for us is, are we lining [up] or are we afraid because they may call us terrorists?” Shaker Elsayed told a crowd of Ethiopian Muslims during a lecture at T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, Va.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/26/us-imam-calls-on-muslims-in-us-to-wage-jihad/

 

 

Putting Lipstick on the Obamacare Pig

The Department of Health and Human Services has just handed out a $3.1 million PR contract to improve the public image of Obamacare. Advertising Age reports that the firm Weber Shandwick will help “roll out a campaign to convince skeptical — or simply confused — Americans the Affordable Care Act is good for them and convince them to enroll in a health plan.”

Obama officials insist the ads won’t be political, but critics recall that just before the 2010 midterm election, HHS spent $3.2 million on “educational” TV ads praising Obamacare. The spots featured the late actor Andy Griffith, a favorite of seniors, who told his fellow retirees that “more good things are coming” from Medicare. But FactCheck, a nonpartisan project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, noted that the ads made no mention of the dramatic cuts to 10 million Medicare Advantage recipients, who are likely to see their privately managed care scaled back. “The words in this ad ring hollow, and the promise that ‘benefits will remain the same’ is just as fictional as the town of Mayberry was when Griffith played the local sheriff,” FactCheck concluded in July 2010.

 

http://nationalreview.com/article/346228/putting-lipstick-obamacare-pig

 

 

Obama and Bush, distinct men with policy overlaps

Despite vast differences with President George W. Bush on ideology, style and temperament, President Barack Obama has stuck with Bush policies or aspirations on a number of fronts, from counterterrorism to immigration, from war strategy to the global fight against AIDS.

 

Even on tax policy, where Bush advocated lower tax rates for all and Obama pushed for higher rates on the rich, Bush’s tax cuts for the middle class not only have survived under Obama, they have become permanent.

Obama inherited from his predecessor two military conflicts, a war on terror and a financial crisis. He also inherited, and in time embraced, the means with which to confront them.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-bush-distinct-men-policy-overlaps-073045083–politics.html;_ylt=A2KJ3CdPu3dR3S4AfDPQtDMD

 

 

What George W. Bush meant for politics

That was the message that then Texas Gov. George W. Bush ran on when he sought the presidency in 2000, a mantra that was aimed at re-inventing the Republican party by casting it as caring and committed to core values, more interested in uniting than dividing. “We will prove that someone who is conservative and compassionate can win without sacrificing principle,” Bush said on the day he announced his presidential campaign in Iowa in the summer of 1999.

 

It’s ironic then that what Bush’s presidency ushered in was a period of hyper-partisanship, the likes of which we hadn’t seen in modern political history — and through which we continue to slog.

Two charts — courtesy of Gallup — tell the story.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/25/what-george-w-bush-meant-for-politics/

 

 

Karl Rove, Koch brothers lead charge to control Republican data
RNC spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski said GOP Data Center will work with other applications — not against them — partly by allowing them to interface with Data Trust. “There has been an appetite for one central open data platform for others in our party to access data and build innovative tools and applications that will help make our party better,” she said.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/karl-rove-koch-brothers-control-republican-data-90385.html?hp=t1

 

 

The Twidiocracy – The decline of Western civilization, 140 characters at a time

You can try, if so inclined. But unlike Kim Kardashian, Lady Gaga, the pope, the Dalai Lama, and the Church of England (which invited Twitter users to help select the next archbishop of Canterbury), you won’t find me there. I’m not on it, and hope never to be. I say hope, because the clip at which the Twidiocracy has infiltrated itself into every crevice of society might leave me no choice. In the dystopian future—which in the age of Google glasses is starting to feel like the dystopian present—I might be forced to join Twitter in order to, say, collect my Social Security e-check when the time comes. Though the likelihood of there still being Social Security in 25 years is much less than the likelihood of people endlessly tweeting about how there’s no more Social Security.

 

If you’re not following this, there’s an outside chance you still have an analog life that unfolds beyond the glow of a screen. That you remember a time, not all that long ago, when the social-media contagion of FacebookTwitterPinterestInstagram hadn’t yet made us wonder how we used to talk to each other. A time when a phone was considered a communication device, not an extra limb. (A Stanford study found 75 percent of iPhone users fall asleep with their phones in their beds, only 2 percent less than the number of spouses who sleep with each other.) More likely, it just means you’ve been in a deep coma since Twitter’s birth in 2006. In which case, I envy you.

 

http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/articles/twidiocracy_719178.html

 

 

What’s Really Happening With Obama’s Voter Data

Exactly where the Obama 2012 data lives is complex, in some cases still undetermined, and mostly obscured. The receptacle for some of the information — which included voter-file data, social-media data, ad interaction and measurement information, email data, polling data, volunteer-profile data and competitive intelligence on GOP contender Mitt Romney’s media buys — remains unsettled in part because Federal Election Commission rules on coordination and campaign financing prevent the old Obama for America campaign from porting everything lock-stock-and-barrel to the new OFA that spun out of it.

 

http://adage.com/article/datadriven-marketing/happening-obama-s-voter-data/241045/

 

 

2013 GPA Redistribution Video Contest Entry – Hillsdale College

Classic lesson in economics and public choice…enjoy!

 

http://youtu.be/OKc4vduADeU

 

 

WARNING:

I’ve been “hacked” a few times over the last few weeks and most recently someone is sending around an email from a “yahoo.com” account that has my name on it.  It’s NOT me!

 

I ONLY use the following two email accounts:

 

sanuzis@gmail.com

 

sanuzis@coasttocoaststrategies.com

 

I do have an aol and me account that are old and few people use it, and I don’t email from it.

 

 

Stay In Touch…Feel Free to Share

My goal is for this to be a weekly political update…sharing political news and analysis that should be of interest to most activists.

 

Please share.

 

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook.

 

On Facebook at:

http://www.facebook.com/sanuzis

 

 

On Twitter at:

@sanuzis

 

 

My blog “That’s Saul Folks” with Weekly Musings & more:

http://thatssaulfolks.com/

 

 

Thanks again for all you do!

 

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

Weekly Musing 4-21-13

Weekly Musing 4-21-13

Saul Anuzis

 

 

America Standing Strong in Boston!

 

The ‘Co-exist’ Bombers

This has been a strange and deadly week in America. On Monday, two bombs exploded at the Boston Marathon, the first successful terrorist attack on a civilian target on American soil since 9/11. And yet a mere two days later, Boston’s death toll was surpassed by a freak fertilizer accident at a small town in Texas.

 

In America, all atrocities are not equal: Minutes after the Senate declined to support so-called gun control in the wake of the Newtown massacre, the president rushed ill-advisedly on air to give a whiny, petulant performance predicated on the proposition that one man’s mass infanticide should call into question the constitutional right to bear arms. Simultaneously, the media remain terrified that another man’s mass infanticide might lead you gullible rubes to question the constitutional right to abortion, so the ongoing Kermit Gosnell trial in Philadelphia has barely made the papers — even though it involves large numbers of fully delivered babies who were decapitated and had their feet chopped off and kept in pickling jars. Which would normally be enough to guarantee a perpetrator front-page coverage for weeks on end. In the most recent testimony, one of the “clinic”’s “nurses” testified that she saw a baby delivered into the toilet, where his little arms and feet flapped around as if trying to swim to safety. Then another “women’s health worker” reached in and, in the procedure’s preferred euphemism, “snipped” the baby’s neck — i.e., severed his spinal column. “Doctor” Gosnell seems likely to prove America’s all-time champion mass murderer. But his victims are ideologically problematic for the media, and so the poor blood-soaked monster will never get his moment in the spotlight.

 

The politicization of mass murder found its perfect expression in one of those near-parodic pieces to which the more tortured self-loathing dweebs of the fin de civilisation West are prone.

 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/346146/%E2%80%98co-exist%E2%80%99-bombers

 

Democrats UNITE behind Gary Peters for U.S. Senate

In what may prove to be a very smart move on the part of Democrats, Debbie Dingell announced she will NOT run for the U.S. Senate and will rally her support behind liberal Congressman Gary Peters.

 

With Senator Carl Levin retiring and his vacancy being filled in a “off year” election here in Michigan, the country is watching who takes this important seat.

 

Republicans continue to search for a candidate who can once again appeal to the “Reagan Democrats” and SE Michigan’s working conservatives who swing Michigan elections.  Two new names have been floating in last few weeks who are not “traditional” politicians, former Domino’s Pizza turn-around exec and U of M Athletic Director Dave Brandon and Detroit civic leader and Walbridge construction company president John Rakolta add fresh perspectives to various names being floated out there.

 

This is a unique opportunity for Michigan as well as Michigan Republicans. Now, more than ever, the U.S. Senate needs another conservative voice to help defeat some of the radical and unaffordable policies of the Obama Administration.  We need someone who understands job creation and believes in American Exceptionalism.  What America needs is an Opportunity Society agenda to put people back to work and make America great again!

 

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130420/POLITICS02/304200369/

 

 

The pursuit of liberty is a marathon

Please tell your children this:  We are attacked in America because we speak about and believe in the power of people to guide themselves through life, to make their own decisions, to think their own thoughts, to speak freely and to pursue their own happiness.

 

Tell them that as long as the Lincoln Memorial and the Jefferson Memorial and the Statue of Liberty grace our great land that those opposed to equality and freedom will always see us as enemies. Tell them that we must always be vigilant, but never afraid.

 

Tell them that we cannot be defeated, because the truth wins, every time.  And we, in America, hold great truths to be self-evident.

Tell them that liberty is a marathon.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/04/15/pursuit-liberty-is-marathon/

 

 

Fault Lines Loom for “Dominant” Dem Majority

In my book, “The Lost Majority,” I express doubts regarding the theories of inherent party dominance, whether propagated by either side. One of the major themes of the book is that parties have, indeed, put together broad-based “coalitions of everyone.” But these coalitions are almost always unstable, as constituent groups’ interests inevitably bump up against one another, and as the other party adapts. Sooner or later — almost always sooner — some new issue cleavage emerges to split the prevailing party’s coalition apart.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/19/fault_lines_loom_for_dominant_dem_majority_118029.html

 

 

Get Rich or Deny Trying – How to make millions off Obama

Welcome to the buckraking phase of the Obama era. If the campaign was about hope, and the early presidency was about change, increasingly the administration has settled into a kind of normalcy in which it accommodates itself to Washington far more than Washington accommodates itself to Obama. That’s not necessarily a bad thing when the result is a bipartisan schmooze-fest at the Jefferson Hotel. But when it comes to the D.C. custom of trading a White House security clearance for a private-sector sinecure, there’s a lot to be said for not going native so easily.

 

Within Obamaworld, there are a few unwritten rules about how to parlay one’s experience into a handsome payday. There is, for example, a loose taboo against joining a K Street lobbying shop and explicitly trading on administration connections. And while joining a consulting firm is acceptable, those who do are reluctant to work for clients reviled by liberals: gun makers, tobacco companies, Big Oil, union busters. Above all, there is a simple prohibition against excessive tackiness. “It’s like: Don’t embarrass yourself. You were part of something special,” says a longtime Obama adviser. “I think if [Obama] were to send an all-staff e-mail, it would be along the lines of Ron Burgundy—‘Stay classy, San Diego.’ ”

 

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112906/where-obama-staff-veterans-are-working-2013#

 

A Rocky Second Term for Obama?

All in all, Obama’s political position seems surprisingly weak today even though he won a strong re-election victory less than six months ago.

Obama tried to console and inspire the people of Boston Thursday with a well-received speech at an interfaith religious service there. But even his ability to serve as a comforter in chief will have limited effect in helping him win congressional approval of his second-term priorities. These include overhauling immigration laws, finding a “grand bargain” to reduce the deficit and limiting climate change.

 

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2013/04/19/a-rocky-second-term-for-obama

 

 

What’s behind the funding of the welfare state

The regulatory, administrative state, which progressives champion, is generally a servant of the strong, for two reasons. It responds to financially powerful and politically sophisticated factions. And it encourages rent-seekers to exploit opportunities for concentrated benefits and dispersed costs (e.g., agriculture subsidies confer sums on large agribusinesses by imposing small costs on 316 million Americans).

 

Such government inevitably means executive government and the derogation of the legislative branch, both of which produce exploding government debt. By explaining these perverse effects of progressivism, the Hudson Institute’s Christopher DeMuth explains contemporary government’s cascading and reinforcing failures.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-f-will-whats-behind-the-funding-of-the-welfare-state/2013/04/17/8686d412-a6bd-11e2-8302-3c7e0ea97057_story.html

 

 

How out of touch is today’s GOP?

But is there any point at which the party’s overall image — and its unpopular stances on specific issues — actually do begin to matter in some concrete way? Is there any point at which it becomes clear that the current GOP strategy — make a deal with Democrats on immigration, but nothing else — is insufficient? What would that look like? Anyone?

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/04/16/how-out-of-touch-is-todays-gop/?hpid=z2

 

GOP Civil War: Establishment turning to Threats, Name-Calling and Dirty Tricks as Grassroots Momentum Builds

This analysis is a little lose in the way they use their terms…I guess anyone who doesn’t agree with them is establishment and not from the grassroots…simplistic at best.  But it’s worth reading and understanding the party’s growing pains…or at least I hope what end up being growing pains.

 

(The Subsidiarity Times) As the GOP Civil War intensifies, the Establishment is growing more desperate as the Grassroots groups (Liberty Movement; Tea Party; Social Conservatives) continue to advance and take over the Republican Party. In mid-February 2013, Professor Angelo Codevilla diagnosed the extraordinary transformation of the attitude of the people at the local levels as being due to a growing realization by voters that they are not being represented by the new “ruling class” in the higher levels of the political parties. With this realization, as unveiled by Professor Codevilla, sinking in on more and more Americans, the momentum of the Grassroots attempted takeover of the Republican Party continues to grow which is leading to desperate tactics on the part of the Establishment to try and stop the momentum. This is leading to the war becoming even more nasty, and makes the likelihood of a division in the Republican Party even more probable. The only question which remains is whether the split will lead to an existence of two major parties on the right, like which happened in Canada in the late 20th Century, or to the complete death of one major party and its replacement by a new rising party, like what happened in the mid-19th Century in America with the Whig Party’s replacement by the Republican Party. What follows here are updates on battles in the GOP Civil War as it continues into its fourth and fifth months.

 

http://subsidiaritytimes.com/2013/04/16/gop-civil-war-establishment-turning-to-threats-name-calling-and-dirty-tricks-as-grassroots-momentum-builds/

 

 

America Needs an Alternative Maximum Tax

With Monday’s deadline for filing tax returns looming, let’s start a national conversation: How much is the most anyone should have to pay? When do taxes indisputably start to harm the economy and produce less revenue—when government takes 50% of people’s income? 60%? 70%?

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323741004578414402175056688.html

 

 

6 Reasons Why States Should Continue to Oppose Obamacare

Over the past year, 34 states have decided against implementing some, or any, parts of Obamacare’s health insurance exchanges—and with good reason. As Cato Institute Health Policy Director Michael Cannon argues in his recent paper “50 Vetoes: How States Can Stop the Obama Health Care Law,” states have the power to block many of Obamacare’s most troublesome provisions and consequences simply by refusing to participate in the implementation process. Cannon’s paper provides an array of reasons why state legislators should resist the law. Here are six:

 

http://reason.com/archives/2013/04/17/6-reasons-states-should-continue-to-oppo

 

 

Growing Ties Between Michigan And China

Michigan exported $3.2 billion worth of goods and services to China in 2012, a 25 percent increase from 2011. (Only Canada and Mexico ranked higher). In addition, Michigan is one of the top 10 states for direct investment from China with over $917 million in capital dollars coming this way in 2012 making it one of the Top 10 states in the nation.

 

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2013/04/15/delegation-cultivates-michigan-china-commerce/

 

 

Yes, There Is a Gosnell Trial Cover-up by Major News Organizations

Mollie Hemingway did yeoman’s work chronicling how faithfully The Washington Post’s health reporter, who covered Todd Aiken, the Susan G. Komen controversy, and the murder of abortion doctor George Tiller, didn’t write a single story on the Gosnell trial. No abortion regulation is too small for the mainstream media to cover; no stupid comment about abortion by any Republican goes unnoticed. So her disinterest in this trial is inexplicable.

 

But while the left has alternately attacked the right for its alleged lack of interest and for paying too much of the “wrong sort” of attention, I haven’t heard a lot about the near silence from the feminist organizations that lecture us endlessly about how they stand for women’s health. I find the claims now that feminists were deeply upset about poor minority women being abused and killed along with their babies a little tough to believe. A search for “Gosnell” on NOW’s website yielded only two hits, both from 2011. Search for “Gosnell” on the League of Women Voters website and you will find nothing. The same search on the NARAL and Planned Parenthood sites returned the same number of hits: zero.

 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/16/yes-there-is-a-gosnell-trial-coverup-by-the-big-news-organizations.html

 

 

From Roe to Gosnell – The case for regime change on abortion.

When you dissent from Roe v. Wade, you notice that people committed to the pro-abortion side almost never acknowledge that the question of abortion poses a conflict of rights or of legitimate interests. Try to pin them down as to where they’d draw the line–at what point in fetal development does abortion become unacceptable? It’s pretty much impossible. The court in Casey said abortion could be restricted after 23 to 24 weeks, earlier than Roe’s 28 weeks, but groups like Planned Parenthood oppose restrictions on late-term abortion, too. All they care about is “a woman’s right to choose.”

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324030704578422883948238160.html

 

 

88 Acres – How Microsoft Quietly Built the City of the Future

The Redmond Operations Center (often called “the ROC”) is located in a drab, nondescript office park. Inside is something unique – a new state-of-the-art “brain” that is transforming Microsoft’s 125-building, 41,664-employee headquarters into one of the smartest corporate campuses in the world.

 

Smith and his team have been working for more than three years to unify an incongruent network of sensors from different eras (think several decades of different sensor technology and dozens of manufacturers). The software that he and his team built strings together thousands of building sensors that track things like heaters, air conditioners, fans, and lights – harvesting billions of data points per week. That data has given the team deep insights, enabled better diagnostics, and has allowed for far more intelligent decision making. A test run of the program in 13 Microsoft buildings has provided staggering results – not only has Microsoft saved energy and millions in maintenance and utility costs, but the company now is hyper-aware of the way its buildings perform.

 

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/stories/88acres/88-acres-how-microsoft-quietly-built-the-city-of-the-future-chapter-1.aspx

 

 

Stay In Touch…Feel Free to Share

My goal is for this to be a weekly political update…sharing political news and analysis that should be of interest to most activists.

 

Please share.

 

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook.

 

On Facebook at:

http://www.facebook.com/sanuzis

 

 

On Twitter at:

@sanuzis

 

 

My blog “That’s Saul Folks” with Weekly Musings & more:

http://thatssaulfolks.com/

 

 

Thanks again for all you do!

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment

Weekly Musing 4-14-3

Weekly Musing 4-14-13

Saul Anuzis

 

R.I.P. R.D. Musser Sr. 

An icon on Mackinac Island and great community leader passed away this week.  He was an honorable man who took great pride in his state and his family’s Grand Hotel.  Our thoughts and prayers go out to his family.

 

 

RNC Meeting

We had a great meeting in LA this week as RNC members and others gathered from around the country.

 

The most controversial and arguably important part of the meeting was the Rules Committee and the changes they adopted.  The RNC unanimously rejected rule 16b that was passed at the last convention.  The presidential campaign pushed through a rule change that limited state’s rights, allowed presidential campaigns to veto duly elected delegates and all in the name of protecting candidates from “faithless committed delegates”.

 

The RNC Rules Committee worked out new compromise language that gave states the right to bind and elect their delegates under their rules; explicitly required the convention to record and announce the delegate vote counts by state; explicitly NOT allow presidential campaigns to veto delegates; and insure the RNC follow and enforce these rules.

 

The RNC Rules Committee has schedule a complete review of each and every rule, one by one, to insure that if any other rules that may have restricted delegate’s rights to play a real role in the process are protected.

 

The Committee also passes 12 resolutions by acclimation that were presented by different members from around the country to the Resolution Committee with no objections.  These were non-controversial reaffirmations of our principles and recognition of various Republican leaders.

 

Chairman Reince Priebus encouraged the RNC to bring together every faction, to hear everyone’s voice and help bring the party together.

 

Obama’s Growth-Busting Budget

No matter how you slice the Obama budget pie, the inescapable fact is that the president wants to get rid of the roughly $1 trillion budget-cutting sequester and substitute in a $1 trillion-plus tax hike. In other words, more spending, more taxing. Growth-busting. The GOP should just say no.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/13/obamas_growth-busting_budget_117935.html

 

 

The Republican Advantage

There’s no question this phenomenon has benefited Republicans. Observing Democrats trying to win a House majority today is akin to watching a soccer team play a comparably skilled opponent with the field slanted 25 degrees against them. Thanks to the concentrated nature of the Democratic vote, Republicans have always occupied at least two dozen more solidly partisan districts than Democrats. But the rise in ironclad districts forces Democrats to win a near-impossible share of what’s left just to even the score.

 

http://www.nationaljournal.com//columns/cook-report/the-republican-advantage-20130411

 

 

The World-Changing Margaret Thatcher

Margaret Thatcher had more impact on the world than any woman ruler since Catherine the Great of Russia. Not only did she turn around—decisively—the British economy in the 1980s, she also saw her methods copied in more than 50 countries. “Thatcherism” was the most popular and successful way of running a country in the last quarter of the 20th century and into the 21st.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204520204577249312904834768.html

 

 

Margaret Thatcher: The woman who made Britain great again

Almost 25 years have passed since Margaret Thatcher left Downing Street, and yet the full scale of her achievement is still surprisingly hard to set out. So completely has her legacy shaped modern Britain, so fully have she and her ideas been woven into its fabric, that it can be hard to appreciate the depth of our debt to this most extraordinary of individuals. For she was not one of those politicians who had the good fortune to go with the grain of her times. She was a leader who wrenched this nation from the path of demoralisation, diminishment and decline so decisively, so self-evidently successfully, that her victory seems, in hindsight, to be almost an inevitability.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9979341/Margaret-Thatcher-The-woman-who-made-Britain-great-again.html

 

 

Thatcher Rejected Conventional Wisdom of Ruling Class

“Divisive” here refers to something specific. It was Margaret Thatcher’s special genius that she systematically rejected the conventional wisdom, almost always well-intentioned, of the political establishment.

Instead, she insisted on hard, uncomfortable truths.

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/11/thatcher_insisted_on_facing_hard_uncomfortable_truths_117900.html

 

 

Despite ‘autopsy,’ GOP could have revival in 2014
The lesson for Democrats is not to count on demographic destiny just yet. The 2014 election could be the last hurrah of the “old” traditional electorate. Democrats and progressives must organize today to prevent that outcome. The path forward for Republicans is clear, too. They will ignore the needs of unmarried women, minorities and young voters at their own peril.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/despite-autopsy-gop-could-have-revival-in-2014-89714.html?hp=l9

 

 

The Young are the Restless

Young people also are the least religious (more than a quarter specify no religion when asked), and they are an increasingly diverse group of voters. Fifty-eight percent of voters under 30 were white non-Hispanic in 2012, down from 74 percent in 2000. Like it or not, younger Americans are thirsty for change that lines up with their more liberal cultural worldview.

Advantage Democrats.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/06/opinion/blow-the-young-are-the-restless.html?_r=0

 

 

How every state voted in every election since 1796 — in 1 chart!

How states evolved in their politics and voting patterns is of endless fascination to us political nerds at the Fix.  Now, thanks to the chart below, which was designed by Riverbed Design and posted online by AIGA Seattle, you can trace how each state voted in every election since 1796. (Yes, 1796!)

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/09/how-every-state-voted-in-every-election-since-1796-in-1-chart/

 

 

Stay In Touch…Feel Free to Share

My goal is for this to be a weekly political update…sharing political news and analysis that should be of interest to most activists.

 

Please share.

 

Feel free to follow me on Twitter and/or Facebook.

 

On Facebook at:

http://www.facebook.com/sanuzis

 

 

On Twitter at:

@sanuzis

 

 

My blog “That’s Saul Folks” with Weekly Musings & more:

http://thatssaulfolks.com/

 

 

Thanks again for all you do!

Posted in Blog | Leave a comment